Dittokevgull wrote:Coach trip up and back in 1 day? Could have a heavy legged team tonight if that's the case.
2-1 Dover
Would take a draw.
Will the radio commentary be available online?
Dittokevgull wrote:Coach trip up and back in 1 day? Could have a heavy legged team tonight if that's the case.
2-1 Dover
Was being sarcastic. MacDownes are the real deal, not sure what everyone sees in Pearce. The myth that he's better than Downes (or Mac for that matter) really does baffle me.Sunnysideup wrote: Was he? In a team where no one (apart from Ricey, and Marquis maybe in the few games he was here?) performed well with any consistency, to say he was one of the "better" players isnt the same as him being "really good". He was just as capable as any of the other defenders at playing the ball to an opponent, missing headers, poor positioning etc etc
But Pearce was really good last season and apparently that's all that matters?CP Gull wrote:Downes and MacDonald for me, regardless of any shortcomings, both play with a passion and desire to win that Pearce has failed to show since being given his chance this season. Not only that but Both, Downes in particular, are also such a threat at set pieces.
But Pearce is a bit quicker! We must play him! Can you not remember last season when he was 'amazing'..?Bigman wrote:I haven't seen Pearce this season, but would go with the other two simply because they were the partnership when we had our amazing run of form. Pearce and Downes were together most of last season and we didn't do well so I'd be concerned their partnership breeds unconfidence (or whatever the actual word for that is).
Agreed. I was probably the only person who was pleased when we signed him.PL21gull wrote:Stevens starting should not be joked about