It must be horrible being wrong 100% of the time.jonnyfive wrote:Brucie, you are right only in the sense that Leroy's signings weren't the best, but the football, oh the football! Glorious times.
Ferrarilover is quiet on these threads. Let me guess: Buckle worst ever, Ling best ever?
I'm "quiet" on these threads because I haven't seen anything like the number of players that the majority here have, so I can add nothing either useful, worthy or amusing (go on, someone say it). That said, I happen not to think that Ling was a bad manager, it's just his style happens to be unappealing to fans. There are plenty here telling us that Leroy was useless because he had a brilliant squad to play with. By that same logic, Ling must be one of the best ever, since he had a pretty ordinary gaggle of players and made the Playoffs.
Buckle's lack of a plan B is what costs him. His talent for taking the oppo by surprise is demonstrated by his success with us in the Cups. However, once his primary has failed to work, he struggles to change things and get the win anyway.
Criticising anyone from the Roberts era is meaningless. SAF couldn't have kept us up, nor a front line of Messi and Ronaldo. Lubos is a big fish in the USMNT pond (the Yanks will elaborate), he can't be all that bad.
To the future, I'm hoping Knill will be as exciting with us as he was with Bury a few years ago (which, judging from the contents of an email I got a while ago, seems likely). That side featuring Nicky Ajose is still one of the most thrilling performances I've ever seen from visitors to Plainmoor.
Matt.