Gloomy Gull wrote:A number of posters appear to be looking to protect Hargreaves with quotes about the ...."sh1t left by previous manager"...."CH record no worse than Knill"....those points are valid and acknowledged.
BUT...when you are appointing a replacement for someone who is considered to be unable to provide the required level of success, isn't the most important consideration of a new appointment that the new he/she is expected to perform ABOVE the level of the outgoing member of staff, with the exisitng tools available to them ?
I find it difficult to believe that the Board honestly considered Hargreaves CV as strong enough to provide the experience required. If they did that due diligence and can, hand on heart, confirm that amongst all the other possible candidates - giving them the benefit of the doubt there were others considered - CH had the strongest CV for the position we were in, then I apologise for my cynicism.
Given all the commentary on these boards about our financial position, I can only draw a conclusion that they went for the least expensive option (I hesitate to use the word cheap), allied to the hope that his "legend" status would encourage the floating Torbay supporter to re-enter Plainmoor on a more regular basis and help provide much needed finance that could be used to improve the "sh1t left by Knill".
I fear that gamble has backfired in a big way !
I suspect that there was an assumption that the appointment of CH would galvanise, inspire and bring the club together. I think - as most of us pointed out at the time - Hargreaves with a mentor e.g. Sturrock, would have been the most sensible solution. It would have enabled Hargreaves to resume control once the situation had been settled, in calmer times when there was no so much at stake. My fear was that Hargreaves fledgling managerial career would be over before it started by thrusting him into the fire, having never even have been in the frying pan. It wasn't fair on him to expect him to do the job of a firefighter with zero experience of being a manager, especially considering the tools he was left.
All that has happened instead, is that he already, after 7 games as a manager, has people questioning him, saying he is crap, people turning against him and he is never really going to get a chance. My view is that he is the right man for this club but perhaps at the wrong time. But he is here and I think we need to stick with him, so that he has an opportunity to build his own team in less choppy circumstances. The fact that it will be in the Conference may benefit him, because you would hope that we would have one of the better budgets in that league, although not the one Buckle had, I suspect.
There is no sense in pretending we have a chance of staying up, we may as well start planning now. I just hope - what could be our last ever Devon Derby - is not when it is all confirmed....at least let us drag Exeter down with us.