Martin Ling BBC Article
-
- Legend
- Posts: 10009
- Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 20:52
- Favourite player: Kev Nicholson
- Location: Bikini Bottom
I assume the club runs itself with total transparency so i'll get onto it now on the net and I should be able to find out what I need to know very quickly then I can apologise if I'm wrong. If the info is readily available for us all to know then i'll have no problems.
Strangely enough it was Pope Gregory the 9th inviting me for drinks aboard his steam yacht, the saucy sue currently wintering in montego bay with the England cricket team and the Balanese Goddess of plenty.
I wasn't castigating you.
I just think it unfair to cast out such statements about people with no knowledge or proof.
Every member of the board of Plainmoor Ltd put money in of varying amounts and none are likely to see it back, if any. They 'invested' into the club to keep it afloat and running.
Whatever one thinks of the running of the club, it cannot be claimed that any director is in it for financial gain. Quite the opposite; all will take a financial hit of varying degrees.
I just think it unfair to cast out such statements about people with no knowledge or proof.
Every member of the board of Plainmoor Ltd put money in of varying amounts and none are likely to see it back, if any. They 'invested' into the club to keep it afloat and running.
Whatever one thinks of the running of the club, it cannot be claimed that any director is in it for financial gain. Quite the opposite; all will take a financial hit of varying degrees.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 10009
- Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 20:52
- Favourite player: Kev Nicholson
- Location: Bikini Bottom
I accept your points Budleigh and you are right. It isn't good practice to post such statements when I have no proof. It's just an ignorant opinion if I'm honest borne of frustration at what I perceive as a quickly growing and disturbing 'them and us' situation which appears to be developing due the total lack of any recognition of the fans and a total lack of communication coming from within. I think some fans are starting to feel a bit taken for granted and treated with a lack of respect. I don't hardly go to many home games a season and I feel that way so Lord knows what ST holders and regulars feel like. I just think that we need to seriously improve the PR between fans and the club because it's embarrassing.
Strangely enough it was Pope Gregory the 9th inviting me for drinks aboard his steam yacht, the saucy sue currently wintering in montego bay with the England cricket team and the Balanese Goddess of plenty.
No problem...
Lot of frustration from top to bottom of the club I would imagine.
Lot of frustration from top to bottom of the club I would imagine.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 19:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
This is brilliant. We live in a nation where it's pretty much the rudest thing you can do to mention money. I daren't even ask my own mother her salary, because it would be such terribly poor form. Yet here we are, on the internet, expecting intimate details of exactly who spends exactly what at the club. It's genius, you couldn't make it up. That absolutely no other business in the world has ever released this sort of information (because it would, presumably, be business suicide) is irrelevant, as soon as Torquay United act in exactly that manner, "the internet" becomes abuzz with people using it as a stick to beat.
As for the "standard of football" we've seen under Hargreaves, I'm afraid some of you have been watching a different team from me. I've watched us dominate entirely almost every minute of every game since Chris arrived. This is markedly different from the approach taken by a number of our other recent managers, who preferred to see us dominated and play on the break or with the long ball. That we've failed to score in a number of matches is a separate issue, but the football we play to create chances for Benyon to squander is a cut above anything I've seen anyone else stick together against us since Hargreaves took over. Now, I'm not saying it's like watching Brasil, but we can only judge ourselves against those around us and, I'm very much afraid, for the last couple of months, we've (by and large) been better than all of them at all bar the one crucial task of sticking it in the onion bag. That's why this relegation hurts so much, because there's no need for us to go down. We're not the worst side in the division, not even close, what we lack is a goalscorer.
And finally, on communication, what is it that we wanted Chris to say different form that which he has said? He said they should have been down to 10 after about 9 seconds and he's right. He's said that there have been big decisions which have gone against us and he's right (the tackle on Bodin against Northants, the failure to dismiss about 6 Dagenham players on Friday, the failure to give a penalty in that game for a very, very clear handball, the failure to spot an equally obvious handball in the Southend game, the criminal decision to dismiss Goodwin, and the same with Stockley and they're just the ones I've thought of in the last 10 seconds). Their manager has said we should have won the match comfortably and he's right. He's been castigated as being "unprofessional", but you tell me what's worse, Chris making his comments after having had 24 hours to reflect, or running to the post-match presser and behaving like Jose Mourinho did after Chelsea's defeat. Both similar matches, both games in which one side hammered the other and the other got extremely lucky. Two totally different reactions. Which one is appearing on the back pages? Which manager is being called a classless **** by basically everyone in the world? Which one has embarrassed himself, his club and his players?
Also, talking about depression isn't really that "brave" is it? Surely, in England in 2014, it's about as brave as a black guy walking down a street in a town in Georgia or a woman turning up at the polls. You don't give a shit if someone's depressed and nor does anyone you know. The odd knuckledragger who does is too busy cashing his Giro and auditioning for Benefits Street to pay any particular attention to an article written by a bloke he's never heard of, published on a website he doesn't use. Nope,I#m afraid that bravery is reserved for firefighters and Royal Marines.
Matt.
As for the "standard of football" we've seen under Hargreaves, I'm afraid some of you have been watching a different team from me. I've watched us dominate entirely almost every minute of every game since Chris arrived. This is markedly different from the approach taken by a number of our other recent managers, who preferred to see us dominated and play on the break or with the long ball. That we've failed to score in a number of matches is a separate issue, but the football we play to create chances for Benyon to squander is a cut above anything I've seen anyone else stick together against us since Hargreaves took over. Now, I'm not saying it's like watching Brasil, but we can only judge ourselves against those around us and, I'm very much afraid, for the last couple of months, we've (by and large) been better than all of them at all bar the one crucial task of sticking it in the onion bag. That's why this relegation hurts so much, because there's no need for us to go down. We're not the worst side in the division, not even close, what we lack is a goalscorer.
And finally, on communication, what is it that we wanted Chris to say different form that which he has said? He said they should have been down to 10 after about 9 seconds and he's right. He's said that there have been big decisions which have gone against us and he's right (the tackle on Bodin against Northants, the failure to dismiss about 6 Dagenham players on Friday, the failure to give a penalty in that game for a very, very clear handball, the failure to spot an equally obvious handball in the Southend game, the criminal decision to dismiss Goodwin, and the same with Stockley and they're just the ones I've thought of in the last 10 seconds). Their manager has said we should have won the match comfortably and he's right. He's been castigated as being "unprofessional", but you tell me what's worse, Chris making his comments after having had 24 hours to reflect, or running to the post-match presser and behaving like Jose Mourinho did after Chelsea's defeat. Both similar matches, both games in which one side hammered the other and the other got extremely lucky. Two totally different reactions. Which one is appearing on the back pages? Which manager is being called a classless **** by basically everyone in the world? Which one has embarrassed himself, his club and his players?
Also, talking about depression isn't really that "brave" is it? Surely, in England in 2014, it's about as brave as a black guy walking down a street in a town in Georgia or a woman turning up at the polls. You don't give a shit if someone's depressed and nor does anyone you know. The odd knuckledragger who does is too busy cashing his Giro and auditioning for Benefits Street to pay any particular attention to an article written by a bloke he's never heard of, published on a website he doesn't use. Nope,I#m afraid that bravery is reserved for firefighters and Royal Marines.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Reserve Player
- Posts: 71
- Joined: 20 Apr 2014, 14:59
- Favourite player: aint got 1
LOL.....PMSL...K....NOBferrarilover wrote:This is brilliant. We live in a nation where it's pretty much the rudest thing you can do to mention money. I daren't even ask my own mother her salary, because it would be such terribly poor form. Yet here we are, on the internet, expecting intimate details of exactly who spends exactly what at the club. It's genius, you couldn't make it up. That absolutely no other business in the world has ever released this sort of information (because it would, presumably, be business suicide) is irrelevant, as soon as Torquay United act in exactly that manner, "the internet" becomes abuzz with people using it as a stick to beat.
As for the "standard of football" we've seen under Hargreaves, I'm afraid some of you have been watching a different team from me. I've watched us dominate entirely almost every minute of every game since Chris arrived. This is markedly different from the approach taken by a number of our other recent managers, who preferred to see us dominated and play on the break or with the long ball. That we've failed to score in a number of matches is a separate issue, but the football we play to create chances for Benyon to squander is a cut above anything I've seen anyone else stick together against us since Hargreaves took over. Now, I'm not saying it's like watching Brasil, but we can only judge ourselves against those around us and, I'm very much afraid, for the last couple of months, we've (by and large) been better than all of them at all bar the one crucial task of sticking it in the onion bag. That's why this relegation hurts so much, because there's no need for us to go down. We're not the worst side in the division, not even close, what we lack is a goalscorer.
And finally, on communication, what is it that we wanted Chris to say different form that which he has said? He said they should have been down to 10 after about 9 seconds and he's right. He's said that there have been big decisions which have gone against us and he's right (the tackle on Bodin against Northants, the failure to dismiss about 6 Dagenham players on Friday, the failure to give a penalty in that game for a very, very clear handball, the failure to spot an equally obvious handball in the Southend game, the criminal decision to dismiss Goodwin, and the same with Stockley and they're just the ones I've thought of in the last 10 seconds). Their manager has said we should have won the match comfortably and he's right. He's been castigated as being "unprofessional", but you tell me what's worse, Chris making his comments after having had 24 hours to reflect, or running to the post-match presser and behaving like Jose Mourinho did after Chelsea's defeat. Both similar matches, both games in which one side hammered the other and the other got extremely lucky. Two totally different reactions. Which one is appearing on the back pages? Which manager is being called a classless **** by basically everyone in the world? Which one has embarrassed himself, his club and his players?
Also, talking about depression isn't really that "brave" is it? Surely, in England in 2014, it's about as brave as a black guy walking down a street in a town in Georgia or a woman turning up at the polls. You don't give a sh*t if someone's depressed and nor does anyone you know. The odd knuckledragger who does is too busy cashing his Giro and auditioning for Benefits Street to pay any particular attention to an article written by a bloke he's never heard of, published on a website he doesn't use. Nope,I#m afraid that bravery is reserved for firefighters and Royal Marines.
Matt.
It's laughable to suggest we've dominated games recently, certainly none of the ones I've seen. More likely that other teams were quite happy to let us waft the ball around aimlessly because we had absolutely zero threat of scoring.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 19:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
This is nonsense. No football team tries to have one penalty in a match and **** all else. They got in our half once all match and, to be honest, against anyone else, they'd have been about 5-0 down when they did so. If we got outplayed like Dagenham did on Friday, this place would be packed to the rafters with people moaning about how we didn't threaten all match and were well lucky not to have been hammered.Jeff wrote:It's laughable to suggest we've dominated games recently, certainly none of the ones I've seen. More likely that other teams were quite happy to let us waft the ball around aimlessly because we had absolutely zero threat of scoring.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
I wasn't fortunate enough to go to Dagenham, but it didn't look like nonsense when I had to watch us comfortably held at bay by Oxford, Southend and Newport.
-
- Out on Loan
- Posts: 267
- Joined: 09 May 2013, 16:47
- Favourite player: Chris Zebroski
That's ironic isn't ityellowwot1 wrote: LOL.....PMSL...K....NOB
-
- Reserve Player
- Posts: 71
- Joined: 20 Apr 2014, 14:59
- Favourite player: aint got 1
I suppose we are to presume if CH is unable to keep his cool and emotions in check long enough to not embarrass himself in front of the radio Devon presenters (who have made it very easy for him so far) then his second in command was in the same state of delirium and unable to talk also? He already stated the players are not intelligent enough to comment but surely his number 2 could have at.least contributed and faced the press and supporters.stefano wrote: Although when CH did press interviews way back when he said that every week!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 10009
- Joined: 17 Jun 2011, 20:52
- Favourite player: Kev Nicholson
- Location: Bikini Bottom
Certainly in the games I've been to under Hargreaves (Oxford, Hartlepool, York, Chesterfield away) and home to Newport and Accrington we have been absolutely appalling and didn't deserve to win any of them let alone score a goal. We had about 2 or 3 clear cut goalscoring opportunities that I can remember in all of them combined. In fact the Chesterfield game was the exception as we matched them for 60 odd minutes and got the Shamir goal and also Wilkinson hit the woodwork and should have scored another and I was impressed with that 60 minutes. Other than that we have thoroughly deserved to lose each game I've seen and played football much worse than under Knill if that were possible.Jeff wrote:It's laughable to suggest we've dominated games recently, certainly none of the ones I've seen. More likely that other teams were quite happy to let us waft the ball around aimlessly because we had absolutely zero threat of scoring.
Strangely enough it was Pope Gregory the 9th inviting me for drinks aboard his steam yacht, the saucy sue currently wintering in montego bay with the England cricket team and the Balanese Goddess of plenty.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7759
- Joined: 02 May 2018, 19:20
- Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)
We were described by Chesterfield's manager as "the best side to play his team all season". I didn't go, but it is a commonly held view that, but for a 1-in-a-million occurrence, Chesterfield wouldn't have got near our goal.
Oxford was a match played in dreadful conditions and was a game that neither side deserved to win. As with so many games, it's easy to say that Torquay weren't very good, but what did Oxford do to earn their win? Absolutely nothing.
Newport drew 0-0 with 10 man Torquay over the space of 80 minutes or so. Aside from one horribly deflected effort, they did nothing and had the benefit of an extra man for a large chunk of the match. In those circumstances, how can they claim to have earned their win?
Southend scored only because the referee allowed their guy to catch the ball and chuck it to his mate.
Accrington's only shot in 90 minutes went in, how have they earned their win?
If we're as bad as some are suggesting, why do teams come to us and score with their only bloody shot? We've lost the last two games 1-0 to penalties, that's not a side being beaten out of site by vastly superior opposition, that's a side lucking out.
If we're going to be critical of Torquay for spurning chances, we have to be at least as critical of other side who fail even to create chances.
If this had been the Dagenham forum, we'd all be on here saying that we are the luckiest side in Britain for having stolen the points in a match in which we committed 40 fouls and didn't have a man sent off, in which it took us over an hour to register our first shot (a piss weak effort from 25 yards which went about 10 yards wide), in which the opposition missed two open goals, one 1-on-1 from 6 yards, two unmarked headers, being denied a penalty for a clear handball and numerous other chances before we were awarded a penalty ourselves as a result of the right back misjudging a 70 yard hack up field. That's not a game plan, that's not one side soaking up pressure and playing on the break, that's one side getting trounced and the rub of the green with the officials and playing an opponent who, with the employ of a proper centre forward, would have been 5-0 up by the time they had their one and only meaningful effort on goal.
Instead, however, this is the Torquay board, so we're all yacking on as though that isn't the case, as though Dagenham missed a host of chances, that they strutted about like Barcelona, that they 'let us have the ball'.
Maybe this happens everywhere, maybe I only notice because I see many more Torquay games than I do anyone else. I expect that is the case, that it's a football supporters lot to judge his side more harshly when they're doing badly and more generously when they're doing well.
Just as winning 1-0 every week have us a false sense of grandure a couple of years ago, even more so losing 1-0 every week gives us a false sense of failure.
Imagine that Karl Hawley had got a dozen goals this season. Not, upon his signing, beyond his reach (he averaged a goal every three starts in his career to that point). We've lost 12 games 1-0. That's 12 extra points we've got without signing any players we don't already have. Those 12 points put us in 18th, four points clear of the drop.
I tweeted the other day that if we sign a striker, we'll get 120 points in the Conference next season. It's an exaggeration, but I stand by the principle. If Friday's chances fall to Reuben Reid or John Marquis instead of Elliot bloody Benyon, then we're golden and Friday was by no means an exception.
Matt.
Oxford was a match played in dreadful conditions and was a game that neither side deserved to win. As with so many games, it's easy to say that Torquay weren't very good, but what did Oxford do to earn their win? Absolutely nothing.
Newport drew 0-0 with 10 man Torquay over the space of 80 minutes or so. Aside from one horribly deflected effort, they did nothing and had the benefit of an extra man for a large chunk of the match. In those circumstances, how can they claim to have earned their win?
Southend scored only because the referee allowed their guy to catch the ball and chuck it to his mate.
Accrington's only shot in 90 minutes went in, how have they earned their win?
If we're as bad as some are suggesting, why do teams come to us and score with their only bloody shot? We've lost the last two games 1-0 to penalties, that's not a side being beaten out of site by vastly superior opposition, that's a side lucking out.
If we're going to be critical of Torquay for spurning chances, we have to be at least as critical of other side who fail even to create chances.
If this had been the Dagenham forum, we'd all be on here saying that we are the luckiest side in Britain for having stolen the points in a match in which we committed 40 fouls and didn't have a man sent off, in which it took us over an hour to register our first shot (a piss weak effort from 25 yards which went about 10 yards wide), in which the opposition missed two open goals, one 1-on-1 from 6 yards, two unmarked headers, being denied a penalty for a clear handball and numerous other chances before we were awarded a penalty ourselves as a result of the right back misjudging a 70 yard hack up field. That's not a game plan, that's not one side soaking up pressure and playing on the break, that's one side getting trounced and the rub of the green with the officials and playing an opponent who, with the employ of a proper centre forward, would have been 5-0 up by the time they had their one and only meaningful effort on goal.
Instead, however, this is the Torquay board, so we're all yacking on as though that isn't the case, as though Dagenham missed a host of chances, that they strutted about like Barcelona, that they 'let us have the ball'.
Maybe this happens everywhere, maybe I only notice because I see many more Torquay games than I do anyone else. I expect that is the case, that it's a football supporters lot to judge his side more harshly when they're doing badly and more generously when they're doing well.
Just as winning 1-0 every week have us a false sense of grandure a couple of years ago, even more so losing 1-0 every week gives us a false sense of failure.
Imagine that Karl Hawley had got a dozen goals this season. Not, upon his signing, beyond his reach (he averaged a goal every three starts in his career to that point). We've lost 12 games 1-0. That's 12 extra points we've got without signing any players we don't already have. Those 12 points put us in 18th, four points clear of the drop.
I tweeted the other day that if we sign a striker, we'll get 120 points in the Conference next season. It's an exaggeration, but I stand by the principle. If Friday's chances fall to Reuben Reid or John Marquis instead of Elliot bloody Benyon, then we're golden and Friday was by no means an exception.
Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6575
- Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 00:30
- Contact:
You're right, Matt. Absolutely agree with you, except (just nit-picking here, pedant that I am) I would have used the word 'employment' instead of 'employ'. Perhaps I, like most of us, have been too ready to ignore the good points of the team's performances under CH, whilst focussing solely on the bad results. The margins between success and failure in any field can be very narrow, and it may need only a small change or two, such as you've suggested, to turn things around for next season.
But (to get back on topic) anyone can be vulnerable to depression at some point in life, and the constant never-ending stress of dealing with those small margins can easily trigger the condition. Only those who have experienced it will ever truly understand, and those suffering from depression deserve sympathy and compassion rather than ridicule and condemnation.
But (to get back on topic) anyone can be vulnerable to depression at some point in life, and the constant never-ending stress of dealing with those small margins can easily trigger the condition. Only those who have experienced it will ever truly understand, and those suffering from depression deserve sympathy and compassion rather than ridicule and condemnation.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests