merse btpir wrote: ↑11 Mar 2018, 07:24
...where my analysis differes from yours is that you see it as 5-3-2 whereas I say they were set up to win with 3-5-2. A 3-5-2 that unravelled and became 5-3-2
And that is the crux of the matter since Owers has been here - Is it a 3-5-2 or a 5-3-2? Formations are blurred at the best of times, but we can at least say there is a discernible back three and two wing-backs. Even if the intention is to start with a 3-5-2 to win, as you say it "unravelled and becomes a 5-3-2" - which more often than not lose. It has been evident to me for some time now that Owers persistent tactical formation is bad for Torquay, simply because to use a 3-5-2 formation you really do need a very talented squad. The central defender must be dominant in the air and happy to move forward with the ball—if he isn't positionally perfect, none of them are. It's flawless, or it's tragic - always the latter in our case. Hence why I have commented on a number of occasions that our backline is a hotbed of indecision which never gets off the ground from minute one. I mean if the 3-5-2 were that perfect and became mainstream in the National League , then limited defenders who simply tackle and clear, would be in danger of becoming redundant.
A 3-5-2 formation should be flexible, accessible and refreshingly different, allowing wing backs to unleash their attacking potential and reduce the strain on their defensive duties. As you saw yesterday this does not happen, and why we capitulate after minute one into a defensive counter attacking 5-3-2 formation - and lose!. We have used this formation 3 times now against Maidstone this season and lost on every occasion. Will the 'One Trick Pony' Mr Owers never learn. Is it no wonder we have the second worst goal difference in the league.
So to recap: to implement a 3-5-2 formation with maximum success you must possess players who are capable of thinking quickly in terms of positioning and distribution. The complexity of the formation, particularly when it comes to covering team-mates and beginning attacks, demands not only a certain kind of player but a certain blend of players and Torquay do not posses players of that calibre. So why cannot Osborne's 'Messiah' see that too. True to form his response to yesterdays game was “We’ve got no-one but ourselves to blame.” - the royal 'we' yet again! As were down anyway (unless your a Torquay 'Opiate' fan) what has Owers to lose in breaking the mould and playing a attacking formation that may be a bit more entertaining for us 'the fans' for the last 10 games - we may even win!
P.S. I was not implying you defended Owers just suggesting
you may wish to defend him based on your absence of criticism on his managerial ineptness in your initial post. Whilst suprised you rose to the bait, am nonetheless glad it sharpened your fangs, and will even buy into your Nicho is rubbish if you accept Owers is even worse :}