TUFC Annual Accounts

Discuss everything TUFC with fans across the globe.
portugull
Plays for Country
Plays for Country
Posts: 2498
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 19:27
Favourite player: lee mansell
Location: Teignmouth
Watches from: Bristow’s Bench

TUFC Annual Accounts

Post by portugull »

Annual Accounts published today.

Losses exceed £1,189,000 so we are loosing nearly £23,000 a week.

Need to look at the numbers but that is the reality the Club is still bleeding money.
grubshed12
Trialist
Trialist
Posts: 3
Joined: 30 Mar 2023, 20:05

Post by grubshed12 »

There is one very worrying paragraph see below.
"At the time of approval of these financial
statements, it is the understanding of the director that such financial support will continue for the remainder of the
2022/23 and into the 2023/24 football season. The club has embarked on a strategic plan to ensure that is can operate
on a sustainable commercial basis"
Backing only into next season...
Strategic Plan to operate. Does this mean lower league and part time .
Very worrying statements.
Time to all join the TUST and brace ourselves.
I am not expecting any statements will be forthcoming from the owner.
Last edited by grubshed12 on 30 Mar 2023, 20:33, edited 1 time in total.
thebigp1
Out on Loan
Out on Loan
Posts: 210
Joined: 22 Aug 2021, 10:48
Watches from: Bristow’s Bench

Post by thebigp1 »

Obviously terrible numbers. As a club we are not generating enough income. We should be able to generate better attendances which would help to some degree but you can hardly blame the causal fan for not turning up this season. That being said we are hardly unique in the amounts we are losing. Do any lower league clubs run at a profit? I very much doubt it.
Colorado
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 130
Joined: 07 Jan 2023, 17:08
Favourite player: Peter Coffill
Location: Windsor Colorado USA

Post by Colorado »

Can you tell from the report where we are losing the most money?
Does it give detail on salaries?



Thanks in advance.
User avatar
Admiral
Hat Trick Hero
Hat Trick Hero
Posts: 943
Joined: 06 Jan 2015, 17:31
Favourite player: Kevin Hill
Location: The Bay

Post by Admiral »

Unfortunately this is the way football has gone. At £15 a ticket, the club would need around 3300 extra fans in each game (without any other sales on food etc) to break even, so this isn’t all down to reduced/low attendances. It’s not like we’ve recruited players on high wages either!

I still don’t understand why the club haven’t looked at a stadium sponsor, even though I’m not a fan of them.
Cheddargull
First Regular
First Regular
Posts: 367
Joined: 02 Oct 2022, 18:06

Post by Cheddargull »

Admiral wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 22:07 I still don’t understand why the club haven’t looked at a stadium sponsor, even though I’m not a fan of them.
Under a previous regime Plainmoor became the Launa Windows Stadium. Maybe it wasn't deemed a success.
culmstockgull
Top Scorer
Top Scorer
Posts: 1192
Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 20:09
Favourite player: stubbs
Location: uffculme
Watches from: Family Stand

Post by culmstockgull »

Torquay united and a strategic plan if our past is anything to go by is rarely used in the same sentence but Its good to see that one is being contemplated,who knows at this stage what strategic means but there are many ways we can save money without any loss of ability to be a football team.
In the recent past we have had a fairy godmother, interspersed with several chancers who should have been selling second hand cars on some dodgy lot. to our present owner who it would seem much to the annoyance of many will keep his word to fund us for five years.
If strategic means having a player manager, no assistant manager , sacking half the bench warming back room staff, closing down the so called underachieving youth system then so be it, it will save considerable money and should if handled correctly not be a backward step, football wise.
Next season we have the new non league contracts, the definite possibility of 1pm kick offs during the winter to save on electricity which can ony reduce the wage bill.
Anyoner who imagines the TUST is a realistic safety net only has to look at the figures, they have on our present spending two weeks money on deposit, if they went to the bank for money they would fail on the first question, what security have you to offer, as for a possible bond, set it at 100 pounds and you would need about 11000 of us to fund a season, and thereafter what is the cunning plan.
In my mind any strategy for funding on a sustainable basis must be almost entirely based on non football activities , yes ,you can have naming rights but in the bay that would be 100K tops, hardly a dent in the debt mountain. many of us have ideas on cost reduction and revenue growth , some of them might even work,
Brewers boy
Out on Loan
Out on Loan
Posts: 253
Joined: 17 Nov 2018, 18:17
Favourite player: Jamie Reid
Location: Brixham
Watches from: Bristow’s Bench

Post by Brewers boy »

As much as I dislike Stadium sponsors shirt sponsors , substitute board sponsors etc, we NEED the money.
North Curry House
Skipper
Skipper
Posts: 711
Joined: 09 Feb 2021, 22:26

Post by North Curry House »

Cheddargull wrote: 31 Mar 2023, 10:35 Under a previous regime Plainmoor became the Launa Windows Stadium. Maybe it wasn't deemed a success.
Like their windows, did not last more than a season.
gullsgullsgulls
Out on Loan
Out on Loan
Posts: 279
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 11:57
Favourite player: Sills

Post by gullsgullsgulls »

It is not possible to read much into a set of exempt accounts, however I would make the following two observations:

- The statement "The club has embarked on a strategic plan to ensure that is can operate on a sustainable commercial basis" is utterly meaningless and probably only included to present the fig-leaf of respectability required to allow whichever entity has ultimately provided the loan to present the asset as recoverable in its own books.

- There are two companies in the TUFC corporate group which tell the story of Osborne's plans in plain English: "TORQUAY UNITED ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL CLUB LIMITED" was established in 1921 with a corporate address at Plainmoor and contains the assets of the club, it is run at a huge loss funded by Osborne via its parent company "RIVIERA STADIUM LIMITED" which holds 93% of the shares in the former, was established in 2016 and has a Bristol address. Osborne has no interest in saving the former, he wants to monetise the latter, clearly in relation to the stadium - I cannot work out what the plan is here, but there will be one. I suspect the ownership of a football club helps with the Gaming International branding and allows them to claim to be a sport and leisure business rather than simply a real estate play, but that is not enough to justify £1.1m losses every year (even with a 25% corporation tax deduction available) so there will be something worth playing for (even if there is a risk it might not pay off, Osborne may consider that a worthy gamble if the potential prize is big enough).
User avatar
happytorq
Plays for Country
Plays for Country
Posts: 2588
Joined: 07 Sep 2010, 02:21
Favourite player: Kevin Hill
Location: Newtown, Connecticut, USA
Watches from: The sofa

Post by happytorq »

gullsgullsgulls wrote: 31 Mar 2023, 16:55 - The statement "The club has embarked on a strategic plan to ensure that is can operate on a sustainable commercial basis" is utterly meaningless

Indeed. I believe this exact phrase has been in each of last 4 or 5 account statements
Images for Avatar Copyright Historical Football Kits and reproduced by kind permission.

Eam non defectum. Ego potest tractare quod. Est spes occidit me.
MellowYellow
Top Scorer
Top Scorer
Posts: 1954
Joined: 26 Jul 2013, 15:26
Favourite player: Tony Scott

Post by MellowYellow »

Not even Wrexham make profit as their newly-released accounts for the 12 months to the end of last June showed a loss of £2.914m despite turnover being up five times on the previous year, at almost £6m.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-65142947
Kingsgull83
On the Bench
On the Bench
Posts: 199
Joined: 12 Aug 2018, 07:05
Favourite player: Rodney Jack
Location: Kingskerswell

Post by Kingsgull83 »

Hi would you expect them to make a profit with their wage bill?
MellowYellow
Top Scorer
Top Scorer
Posts: 1954
Joined: 26 Jul 2013, 15:26
Favourite player: Tony Scott

Post by MellowYellow »

Kingsgull83 wrote: 01 Apr 2023, 15:33 Hi would you expect them to make a profit with their wage bill?
No! but if our turnover was up five times on the previous year I would imagine we would turn a profit and be title chasing rather than potential relegation fodder ,
exilegull
Vice Captain
Vice Captain
Posts: 533
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:01

Post by exilegull »

grubshed12 wrote: 30 Mar 2023, 20:10 There is one very worrying paragraph see below.
"At the time of approval of these financial
statements, it is the understanding of the director that such financial support will continue for the remainder of the
2022/23 and into the 2023/24 football season. The club has embarked on a strategic plan to ensure that is can operate
on a sustainable commercial basis"
Backing only into next season...
Strategic Plan to operate. Does this mean lower league and part time .
Very worrying statements.
I wouldn't worry too much about that - these comments are for the going concern basis of the company and it only needs to look forward 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statement which is the exact period outline.There is no need to commit to anything longer in these financial statements.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gulliball, United62 and 80 guests