One fifth of 550 is 110.NickGull wrote: Difficult though, as said. That is basically our average home fans, minus 200 or so. Yours is inflated by teams bringing more fans. We took 550 to you, you brought 1/5 of that so it's nonsense to gauge it like that.
Lower league clubs that spend more than they earn ALWAYS go bust eventually, the sugar daddy or daddies get fed up and pull out. Look at Maidstone, Darlington, Chester, Rushden, and, hopefully shortly, Crawley. Just put a sock in it you tosser.SLC Crawley wrote:What makes me laugh about you lot is your criticism of our 'temporary' stand (there's a clue in the title there). You seem to conveniently forget it's IN ADDITION to an existing stand that's only 600 seats short of your new one.
MULTIPLE FAIL BY IDIOTS LOOKING FOR A CHEAP SHOT.
Be honest, do any of you think you'll ever get the better of Crawley? Seems that for every big decision or event you always end up licking your wounds against us. Why is that? It must really grate. The ultimate sickener for you is that if O'Kane does sign, it'll be with money earned from a direct link back to our Man United game. Thanks for that. x
You mean like when you had four stands the previous season and were up at the top, yet only managed to average 2,630?AlexGulls wrote:Not including the fact we had three stands for all of last season (of which does come into it as plenty didnt want to go in the Pop/Family Stand) and the fact it was Crawleys first season in the FL and they were near the top ALL season which kind of makes just over 3,000 embarrasing and shows how small they are. If we were in there position all season with four stands we would get 3,500 most weeks IMO.
The point being your average attendance is just 342 higher than our own, when we took 348 more than you brought to us. Imagining it was a similar sort of thing for sides like Plymouth, Brizzle, Gillingham, Wimbledon etc, your average is alot higher than it would be if you were in our location.SLC Crawley wrote:
One fifth of 550 is 110.
Why does your website say 202 then?
ANOTHER FAIL.
Interesting, apart from the fact we earn more than we spend, or did you miss our annual accounts?gullintwoplaces wrote: Lower league clubs that spend more than they earn ALWAYS go bust eventually, the sugar daddy or daddies get fed up and pull out. Look at Maidstone, Darlington, Chester, Rushden, and, hopefully shortly, Crawley. Just put a sock in it you tosser.
Interesting, I think you will find that Boston United showed a\ similar position, but then their accounts did not show the full picture did they? Sorry mate, you are clearly a deluded fool. Every football fan outside Crawley hates your team, mainly because it revelled in being managed by a convicted criminal for so long. Now you are hated because you have become a bunch of arrogant, deluded tossers. We will all laugh when your team goes bust mate, I will buy a bottle of champagne. Now sod off and go play with your aeroplanes.SLC Crawley wrote: Interesting, apart from the fact we earn more than we spend, or did you miss our annual accounts?
EASY FAIL.
Nick, you're likening the attendances of a club who have 17 Premier and Football League sides within 35 miles... with Torquay. And you're up who exactly when it comes to other clubs trying to lure supporters?NickGull wrote: The point being your average attendance is just 342 higher than our own, when we took 348 more than you brought to us. Imagining it was a similar sort of thing for sides like Plymouth, Brizzle, Gillingham, Wimbledon etc, your average is alot higher than it would be if you were in our location.
As for that one, season before last we were never at the top. We were at the foot of the playoffs, there's a difference there.
Actually it's called defending your club from sensationalist and spiteful comments made by sad lonely F5 forum dwellers - ignorant and bitter idiots. Oh look, found some.Kernowgull wrote:Going on another clubs forum to gloat and try and wind people up to get some satisfaction because you have no friends and your own life is so pathetic its the only way you can pretend to yourself you are in some way succesful.
FAIL
Hum, historical attendance freak, eh.SLC Crawley wrote: You mean like when you had four stands the previous season and were up at the top, yet only managed to average 2,630?
OBVIOUS RATHER EMBARRASSING FAIL.
I somehow doubt the grapes from the Champagne region are quite sour enough for you, 'mate'.gullintwoplaces wrote: Interesting, I think you will find that Boston United showed a\ similar position, but then their accounts did not show the full picture did they? Sorry mate, you are clearly a deluded fool. Every football fan outside Crawley hates your team, mainly because it revelled in being managed by a convicted criminal for so long. Now you are hated because you have become a bunch of arrogant, deluded tossers. We will all laugh when your team goes bust mate, I will buy a bottle of champagne. Now sod off and go play with your aeroplanes.
Sorry, is there a point to this? If so, can you hurry up as I'm off out?CP Gull wrote: Hum, historical attendance freak, eh.
Hardly in a position to gloat are you. The last season we were in the Conference (before the money started to roll in) when you finished just outside the Play offs you averaged 1233, the season before that 1042.
SLC Crawley wrote:What makes me laugh about you lot is your criticism of our 'temporary' stand (there's a clue in the title there). You seem to conveniently forget it's IN ADDITION to an existing stand that's only 600 seats short of your new one.
MULTIPLE FAIL BY IDIOTS LOOKING FOR A CHEAP SHOT.
Be honest, do any of you think you'll ever get the better of Crawley? Seems that for every big decision or event you always end up licking your wounds against us. Why is that? It must really grate. The ultimate sickener for you is that if O'Kane does sign, it'll be with money earned from a direct link back to our Man United game. Thanks for that. x
THAT'S A PASS!austrianandygull wrote:
I presume you actually live in Crawley. if so you have my deepest sympathies and if you were in the Champions League and we were in the BSP then i'd still be very content as i know that i don't live in Crawley but you do. Also stop saying ANOTHER FAIL! What are you? A pissing driving instructor!? We don't care what you post because you won't exist as a league club 5 years from now. We could get one man and a dog at Plainmoor in five years time but we'd still have one more fan than you because you won't exist. The dog would know more about sustainable football administration than the clowns taking your club bankrupt and he's only a poodle! It's crazy you know because dogs are clever enough to realize that if they sit down and shut up they'll get rewarded. Crawley fans aren't as clever as our canid friends and are happy to stand an vocalize til the cows come home and when the cows eventually DO make it wearily across the slurried fields of West Sussex and into their cowshed (Broadfield Stadium), then there they will stay - all courtesy of Crawley Town being run like a knackered old Fiat Panda in the Monaco GP thus falling to pieces, folding and the lovely old ground that once was the home of the mighty CTFC being regenerated as a cattle farm.
Meanwhile little old Torquay will most probably still be in league 2 playing sh*t like Accrington. Happy days.
Users browsing this forum: TheYellowFromExeter and 39 guests
