Page 2 of 3
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 21:40
by AustrianAndyGull
Mansell
Olejnik
Howe
O Kane
Robertson
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 21:41
by luketufc
Olejnik
Howe
Manse
Okane
Macklin
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 22:18
by Southampton Gull
O'Kane
Olejnik
Oastler
O'Kane Howe
Robertson
Edit: I've only just realised what highweekgull meant :ping:
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 22:32
by highweekgull
Southampton Gull wrote:O'Kane
Olejnik
Oastler
O'Kane
Robertson
You really wanna go for Eunan don't you Dave?
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 22:41
by Southampton Gull
All that was good about us today went through Eunan, I just rate him so highly. When he leaves, I just hope we get what he's really worth, most potential I've seen wear our shirt for a long long time. I better delete these posts later just so we dont annoy Gulliball
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 23:02
by Father Jack
1-Robertson
2-Bobby O
3-Howe
4-O'Kane
5-Mansell
Thought they were the standout players with not much to choose between them
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 23:29
by AustrianAndyGull
Southampton Gull wrote:All that was good about us today went through Eunan, I just rate him so highly. When he leaves, I just hope we get what he's really worth, most potential I've seen wear our shirt for a long long time. I better delete these posts later just so we dont annoy Gulliball
Got to agree with you there (Dave is it?) rather than call you Southampton. I first saw O Kane at Hereford when he first signed and thought he was pants. He was skinny, shrugged off the ball too easy and had nothing to offer. Time has passed and he is quite obviously Bucks best acquisition which is why i don't get why he didn't go to Rovers. The quality the boy has is immense and he could eventually progress to championship level at least. I echo your concerns about the fee we will get for him when he moves on given our track record of gift wrapping players and sending them on their way to their new club for peanuts. With Eunan we can't f**k about and should demand what he is worth.
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 23:38
by Colorado Gull
andygullagain wrote:
Got to agree with you there (Dave is it?) rather than call you Southampton. I first saw O Kane at Hereford when he first signed and thought he was pants. He was skinny, shrugged off the ball too easy and had nothing to offer. Time has passed and he is quite obviously Bucks best acquisition which is why i don't get why he didn't go to Rovers. The quality the boy has is immense and he could eventually progress to championship level at least. I echo your concerns about the fee we will get for him when he moves on given our track record of gift wrapping players and sending them on their way to their new club for peanuts. With Eunan we can't f**k about and should demand what he is worth.
He didn't go to Rovers, simply because Rovers couldn't afford him. I have no doubt that Buckle wanted him, just couldn't afford him. They couldn't afford Eunan because he has a 2 year contract with us.
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 23:44
by Father Jack
Gulliball wrote:Thought I'd do this again this season. The idea is to collect fans' opinions on who performs in each match, so that over the season there's a record with each game counting the same, rather than the traditional player of the award that goes to someone who ends the season strongly.
I take it you have to be at the match, otherwise you are just going off other peoples opinions?
Oh, and what happens if, for instance, I thought (for the sake of argument) that Saah and Stevens were the only players worth awarding points to (not today obviously!) but couldnt decide which was more deserving and thought they both deserved number one?
(do forgive so many questions! =D )
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 23:58
by Gulliball
Yes, you have to have been to the game.
You can put players in joint positions, just don't choose more than five in total. I'll just split the total points for the two positions in half to each player.
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 00:12
by Father Jack
Gulliball wrote:Yes, you have to have been to the game.
You can put players in joint positions, just don't choose more than five in total. I'll just split the total points for the two positions in half to each player.
Only asked cos theres at least one poster on this thread that said he wasnt at the match (on the match thread itself)
Think ive got the gist of the points. Only 2 players picked as joint 1st would be 4 and a half each? Bet you hate it if someone says 3 players all in last place
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 00:24
by Gulliball
For an away game miles up North on a Tuesday, I'd just go into decimal figures if it's important to the end result. With a home game and this many replies then it 999/1000 it won't make any difference to the results anyway. From my experiences last season, when there's a good level of replies there's usually a pretty strong consensus.
I probably should have mentioned this in the opening post, but the idea is for match-going fans to vote. If you weren't at the game then there's not really anything for you to base an answer on.
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 09:20
by MidDevon
O'Kane
Olejnik
....and then I struggle, thought the rest were average at best
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 09:29
by WHG
1. O'Kane
2. Olejnik
3. Howe
Re: Man of the Match - Burton
Posted: 07 Aug 2011, 14:06
by A J
1. Bobby Olejnik
2. Chris Robertson
3. Eunan O'Kane
4. Lee Mansell
5. Rene Howe