Page 2 of 5

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 17:25
by ferrarilover
This might be a matter of mere semantics, but I don't think we can loan him in because he doesn't have a club because his contact has been cancelled. I guess whatever, the price is right, my only relevant concern would be that Luton would probably offer him a larger salary.

Matt.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 17:32
by SuperNickyWroe
ferrarilover wrote:This might be a matter of mere semantics, but I don't think we can loan him in because he doesn't have a club because his contact has been cancelled. I guess whatever, the price is right, my only relevant concern would be that Luton would probably offer him a larger salary.

Matt.
true matt, but would he want to play in the BSP?

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 17:38
by ferrarilover
I don't see why not, Scotty Rendell seems to be doing ok. He's played there before, its the Buckle factor, Luton are doing well, they'll offer him a wedge, it's 6000 people a week through the doors (last time I checked, that could be wrong now). In many ways, Luton offer more to him than just about any club in L2 and the L2 clubs who might be more attractive to him (Vale and the Gills) probably don't want him. I can't see a L1 club giving him anything, so Luton (aside from the division they're in) seem to be his best option.

Matt.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 17:49
by SDYellow
I would take him back but only for a prove yourself six months with a view to an extension. But i reckon as Matt says there will be interest from Luton and I reckon Plymouth who are in dire need of something upfront to replace Chadwick.

That aside, I believe he would transform out attacking abilities finally playing two strikers, although I thought Jarvis was starting to look good behind Rene.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 17:51
by SuperNickyWroe
SDYellow wrote:I would take him back but only for a prove yourself six months with a view to an extension. But i reckon as Matt says there will be interest from Luton and I reckon Plymouth who are in dire need of something upfront to replace Chadwick.

That aside, I believe he would transform out attacking abilities finally playing two strikers, although I thought Jarvis was starting to look good behind Rene.
dont think he will be going there.......... 8/

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 17:53
by NA Gull
Would give us the pace and power we lack (howe apart). Would take him back until the end of the season and see how things went.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 18:03
by ROADRUNNER
dont think wotten would be impressed, better hide the vase :lol:

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 19:01
by AustrianAndyGull
Agree with NA Gull. It would be good to get him back for the remainder to see how things went but doubt very much whether it would happen. I don't actually rate Zebs that much in all honesty but he is much better than what we have at the minute ( Howe aside ) and could only benefit the team.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 19:11
by Gulliball
Quality wise, I would have him back in a second. He would be ideal for our 4-5-1 formation. Bodin-Howe-Zebroski as a front three (with all on form) would be devastating.

However, to miss 4 games in half a season and get in even more trouble on a night out makes him totally unreliable. A professional footballer should not be going out on New Year's Eve when there is a game the next day.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 21:14
by portugull
Am I correct Zebs lives in Swindon? If so he would prefer Luton but I think he enjoyed his time at Plainmoor.
Martin Ling and the Board may not want him but I always rated him at League 2 level.
Despite his record he will not be short of offers. He is just the type of player we currently lack.
To those of you who know Manse what would he say?????

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 04 Jan 2013, 23:32
by ferrarilover
Following his Torquay indiscretion, he moved back to Swindon to live with (under the supervision of) his father so it could well be the case that he still lives there.

I think the board will be the real problem. I know that Simon Baker was just about as unimpressed as you'd expect following what happened on that fateful night, so ML would REALLY have to want him to convince the money men to pony up.

Matt.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 05 Jan 2013, 01:35
by usagullmichigan
I'd rather have Luke McCormick than Zebs. ( just to stir the argument from last season)

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 05 Jan 2013, 05:31
by ferrarilover
Or Lee Hughes?

Matt.

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 05 Jan 2013, 08:13
by northyorkshiregull
I would have him back in a flash.exackly what we need.sell Danny to loo town if we have to to free the funds for his wages

Re: Chris Zebroski

Posted: 05 Jan 2013, 10:00
by Lloyder5
We always must take some risks to get better quality players; Fowler's hips, Saunder's knee, Graham's attitude; and then be better than most at managing that sort of player. Zebs is not in that class but he would improve the current team. There are times when he is like two players in one when he is up and down the flank. I'd sign him.