Potential Buyers
-
- Out on Loan
- Posts: 271
- Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 20:47
- Watches from: Pop side
So who exactly are the people that are going in with TUST. Does anyone know?
-
- On the Bench
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 21 Feb 2021, 15:10
The TUST statement names them!!
-
- Out on Loan
- Posts: 271
- Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 20:47
- Watches from: Pop side
I've read the statement. I'm asking if anyone knows who they are and if they might be a good fit?
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 20:09
- Favourite player: stubbs
- Location: uffculme
- Watches from: Family Stand
Interesting news from the TUST this morning , as a member of the TUST I would like to see a lot more detail before I consider investing in a share offer,150 thousand required from us at say 100 pounds a share, well, you do the maths , I am lucky enough to be in a position where I can purchase shares but many do not have this luxury.
More inportantly a BBC news article dated the 8th March stated that a bidder(singular) had been identified who can deliver an exciting and deliverable solution to our troubles, as that quote came from the TUST I give it credence. Now that bidder seems to have gone and what we have left is a joint TUST bid with some local businessman and the TUST will invest some of the 60,000 they hold of our money, why not all of it, if they are waiting for a rainy day I think that day has long since come and gone, their crowdfunder stalled at five thousand which to me indicates a marked reluctance by fans to give unless we know a positive outcome is possible.
Do I want our club to be run by a group of very well intentioned but ultimately unqualified people other than their obvious love of the club, if its initially a 50/50 run club who makes the decisions, who decides who the manager is, who decides what players we acquire or release, will anything get done when decisions are made by committee and sub committees reporting to the committee, how many of these up to now volunteers will now acquire paid employment in the club, as mentioned a lot more information is required.
More inportantly a BBC news article dated the 8th March stated that a bidder(singular) had been identified who can deliver an exciting and deliverable solution to our troubles, as that quote came from the TUST I give it credence. Now that bidder seems to have gone and what we have left is a joint TUST bid with some local businessman and the TUST will invest some of the 60,000 they hold of our money, why not all of it, if they are waiting for a rainy day I think that day has long since come and gone, their crowdfunder stalled at five thousand which to me indicates a marked reluctance by fans to give unless we know a positive outcome is possible.
Do I want our club to be run by a group of very well intentioned but ultimately unqualified people other than their obvious love of the club, if its initially a 50/50 run club who makes the decisions, who decides who the manager is, who decides what players we acquire or release, will anything get done when decisions are made by committee and sub committees reporting to the committee, how many of these up to now volunteers will now acquire paid employment in the club, as mentioned a lot more information is required.
Can you point me in the direction of this article? Thanks.culmstockgull wrote: ↑28 Mar 2024, 13:51
More inportantly a BBC news article dated the 8th March stated that a bidder(singular) had been identified who can deliver an exciting and deliverable solution to our troubles, as that quote came from the TUST I give it credence.
-
- Out on Loan
- Posts: 271
- Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 20:47
- Watches from: Pop side
Culmstock - you raise some very interesting and relevant points. I suspect most of which aren't even known by TUST as yet.
But, this may be a way of the fans eventually owing 100% of the club. It seams to work ok at Exeter!!
But, this may be a way of the fans eventually owing 100% of the club. It seams to work ok at Exeter!!
Are you sure that TUST said that it was a single bidder. The consortium lead has over 7 million in his p/l according to companies house so I guess he was the wealthy individual referred to - I am guessing that he is now part of the TUST bid so I would also assume that if he throwing 150k in then that is chicken feed to him.
I would agree with culmstock -we need to know alot more about it. The issue with being part time is that we are unlikely to get out of this league as we will be at a massive disadvantage to London clubs in attracting players.
I would agree with culmstock -we need to know alot more about it. The issue with being part time is that we are unlikely to get out of this league as we will be at a massive disadvantage to London clubs in attracting players.
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 27 Aug 2018, 20:09
- Favourite player: stubbs
- Location: uffculme
- Watches from: Family Stand
I know Mark Bowes-Cavanagh, he’s a Mason with my Dad and I use to play football with him for Galmpton, he’s a good guy and does a lot of work for charity within the masons, definitely a local person who supports Torquay United
I think I found it?culmstockgull wrote: ↑28 Mar 2024, 14:42 Cannot link it for some reason but its an article on BBC sport concerning Torquay United dated the 8th march.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68512186
The TUST said at that time that it was unlikely they would make a bid. I assume now that there are no other suitable bids and it's either us running it, or going bust and to start again lower down the leagues as a phoenix club? Maybe we only have those options? Maybe it would be best to start again at a lower level as we know nothing all about running a club? Mistakes at a lower level won't matter so much. Need more info.
Last edited by TommyGunn on 28 Mar 2024, 16:18, edited 1 time in total.
- happytorq
- Plays for Country
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: 07 Sep 2010, 02:21
- Favourite player: Kevin Hill
- Location: Newtown, Connecticut, USA
- Watches from: The sofa
We don't know the conversations that have happened between this consortium and the Trust. I could see a situation in which the consortium have the readies to buy the club but feel that - since they're not immortal - it makes sense to have the trust involved at the boardroom level. If that's true, then it's reasonable that the trust would be asked to buy-in in the same way as any other member ofa consortium.TommyGunn wrote: ↑28 Mar 2024, 15:48 I think I found it?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68512186
The TUST said at that time that it was unlikely they would make a bid. I assume now that there are no other suitable bids and it's either us running it, or going bust and to start again lower down the leagues as a phoenix club? Maybe we only have those options? Maybe it would be best to start again at a lower level as we know nothing all about running a club? Mistaes at a lower level won't matter so much. Need more info.
timing of the trust statement is intereststing, imo - I wonder if they've chosen to go public now because there are competing offers and they want the fans to to be 'on board' with one versus another.
obviously, I don't know all the details, but I don't think it's necessarily something we should be afraid of. As you said, though - more info needed.
Images for Avatar Copyright Historical Football Kits and reproduced by kind permission.
Eam non defectum. Ego potest tractare quod. Est spes occidit me.
Eam non defectum. Ego potest tractare quod. Est spes occidit me.
Well it wont be but if there are rival bids it would be nice to know before putting moneyt to the TUST iniative
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: A Realist, Hereford Gull66, knightmaregull, notnow, Plainmoorish and 103 guests