Bringing TUFC fans together, from Plainmoor to across the globe
https://torquayfans.com/
I was about 20 foot to your left short guy wearing a dark blue gulls polo shirt and shorts. Stood against barrier at the front.ferrarilover wrote:I'm universally known as Matt in the Hat. It'll have been me. Which one were you?
I think Ives'll look better as a winger, rather than a full back.
Matt.
The most accurate post in forum history. Word perfect. If you want an exactly representative idea of what happened today, this is it.dannyrvtufc4life wrote:Courtney Baker-Richards was woeful. Chappell look good, so did Pearce, Downes and Niall made a few good runs. Number 20 (can't spell his last name, Toby something) was class.
Cameron was okay in the first half, he seems to do the hard part but lets himself down with the end product. The left back? Ives? He wasn't as good as he was against Totnes. Yeoman was totally ineffective. Harding was okay, the tall gangily black bloke had a good touch and surprisingly had some pace, about it. Sully seemed useful. Looks determined on and off the ball.
After watching our two friendlies, I think we're going the right way, it's good progress and we need to try and sign '20' ASAP!!
Creggs gone home? he has no home. Don't think they would call it a day before the trail period is over. Maybe saved for Yeovil game - if not on team sheet, then he has gone. Shame, think it would have been a huge asset but maybe not enough pace for CH new young warriors.supergulls wrote: Creggs trial is over he has gone home.
Matt, try eating cereal instead of a dictionary for breakfast would you ? Even I'm struggling with the vocabulary this early on a Sunday ! (Did have an extremely demanding day yesterday, in fairness )ferrarilover wrote:Mellow - take it from about half a dozen people who know, he's gone.
Briddy - we did show more pace as you suggest, but it was purely coincidental that the upping in tempo coincided with the introduction of 17. Correlation and causation are different things. I suspect this was masked, because the real causation (Thommo, Chaps and 20) were introduced contemporaneously with 17.
Matt.
Probably also helped by tiring Dorchester players. Surprisingly they made relatively few changes during the game resulting in several of their team playing 90 mins in their first pre season game.Bridportgull wrote:I must have been at a different match because I felt when 17 and 20! Game on we showed much more speed and high tempo
. May be worth another game or two against better opposition.
You certainly did not upset me. TaxiLady on the other hand...yeovilgull wrote: Probably also helped by tiring Dorchester players. Surprisingly they made relatively few changes during the game resulting in several of their team playing 90 mins in their first pre season game.
Of the trialists yesterday, I'd be happy with Angus and 20, wasn't keen on the guy up front first half alongside Yeoman. On reflection 17 was ok, mobile and got into scoring positions, just needs some heading practice
I've a sneaky feeling we may be seeing a couple of long term loanees coming in.(Cargill being one hopefully).
Matt, sorry if I upset you, wasn't intended even if you did think I was a Dorch. I'm sure you will get over it and be able to move on to bigger insults as the new season progresses.
Yes he did and he did well again. Got himself booked for the second of two 'full blooded' challenges in the space of 5 minutes. Sounds silly, but he might be the replacement for Manse in that role.shepchenko10 wrote:did Courtney Richards play yesterday as theres no match report on the website or the team? Also looks like Cureton is re-signing for Cheltenham strange one that
Is that a woman at no.19 for Dorchester?BayGull wrote:
