Good question, why sign him? ask that twit of a previous manager...Jeff wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 18:39 Damning assessment of Neal Osborn then. What's the point in having him as back-up if we aren't actually going to play him (although I appreciate that some people said he looked ropey in pre-season, but then why sign him).
Tbf Osborn has been through the youth ranks of a side who give the impression of having a superior youth setup. On paper he's not that different to Lavercombe's situation
Dan Lavercombe and Wigan
-
- First Regular
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 29 Jul 2017, 22:00
- Favourite player: argreaveswithanh
-
- Top Scorer
- Posts: 1864
- Joined: 02 Jan 2017, 10:58
- Favourite player: robin stubbs
So with a 35 veteran goalkeeper, why sign someone clearly not fit for purpose?
Another example of poor homework by the former manager!
-
- Plays for Country
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 21:13
- Favourite player: Chris Myers
- Location: Wigan
Equally how accountable is our head of recruitment in all these signingsmerse btpir wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 19:58 So with a 35 veteran goalkeeper, why sign someone clearly not fit for purpose?
Another example of poor homework by the former manager!
Lucy
-
- Plays for Country
- Posts: 2168
- Joined: 07 Oct 2013, 17:48
- Favourite player: Jake Andrews
- Location: Preston Sands
I would not worry now as it looks as though they've just woke up. I have noticed Clarke has been injured as well and was the reason he was left out of a couple of pre-season games. At the moment he's priceless and need to look after him.
-
- First Regular
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 13 Jun 2011, 13:29
- Favourite player: Alex Russell
- Watches from: Pop side
Because its a cheap option rather than spending budget on a backup player who won't get games. When something does happen, you sign a loan keeper, as we have done.merse btpir wrote: ↑25 Aug 2017, 19:58 So with a 35 veteran goalkeeper, why sign someone clearly not fit for purpose?
Another example of poor homework by the former manager!
I would expect that most NL managers with limited budgets would look for a cheap option for their number 2 keeper and as you say look to the loan market to replace their number 1 if he was going to be out for a few matches.
I seem to remember the 46 year old pieman from Sutton having another job with the club as well as being the back up goalie.
It must have been quite soul destroying for our number 2 goalie last season when he didn't get a first team chance during the 6 months he was with us.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests