Page 5 of 11

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:04
by Dave_Pougher
Modgull wrote:2-5 ft ho ho

What ever the arguments for against Buckle/Ling we can't get away from the fact that what Rovers are going through now that could have been us had he stayed!

Gees God.

Thank you Paul !

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:06
by divingbboy
Oh, well, Paul. I'm sure there must be a couple of Conference South teams looking for a young and ambitious manager such as yourself.

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:09
by Neal
If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull :)

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:10
by Plymouth Gull
Dave_Pougher wrote:
What ever the arguments for against Buckle/Ling we can't get away from the fact that what Rovers are going through now that could have been us had he stayed!

Gees God.

Thank you Paul !
Difficult to say that. Had he stayed, Branston would be here, Stanley, Zebs, probably Robinson & Tomlin would be here. What positions they'd be playing in though is anyones guess! :rofl:

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:26
by stevegull
NickGull wrote: Difficult to say that. Had he stayed, Branston would be here, Stanley, Zebs, probably Robinson & Tomlin would be here. What positions they'd be playing in though is anyones guess! :rofl:
Now that's not fair. Branston could do a decent job on the right wing! :lol:

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:32
by Dave
and Tomlin could have played in goal, iam sure :lol:

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:44
by Burnhamgull
Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull :)
Are you kidding? Funniest thing on the web tonight :)

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:45
by Modgull
Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull :)
Yes, just spent a happy half hour reading all the comments about PB and his team!

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 18:04
by Neal
hahaha me too I cant keep away, its so amusing!

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 18:16
by Neal
mmmmm.... they dont want anymore Torquay rejects it seems, Leroy was at the game

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 09:03
by Modgull
Neal wrote:mmmmm.... they dont want anymore Torquay rejects it seems, Leroy was at the game
I guess that puts paid to the "Robbo to Rovers in the transfer window" thread

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 09:45
by Dave_Pougher
Neal wrote:If you are at all sensitive dont go on the ROVERS forum, gee they aint happy at all, the language is awfull :)

♪ ♫ ♪ ♫
Don't post if you cant be nice
Don't post if you cant be nice


lol

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 10:53
by Neal
Mmmmm.... not so sure now, looks like Buckle is staying and has the go ahead to get 3 or 4 new players including 2 CB's, like urgently. The fans dont want any more Torquay rejects, but will Buckle worry about that, mmmmm... doubt it.

I reckon Buckle will try and come here as he knows we are an easy touch and we have 3 good CB's.

This saga could continue guys.

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 13:00
by wodger of awabia
brucie wrote:One talks total cockney

The other is a total c**k

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Yes, & is excused for his "verbial kitchen sink" comment! :bow: :clap: :clap: :~D :lol: :lol: :scarf: :scarf:

Re: Ling v Buckle

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 13:06
by wodger of awabia
forevertufc wrote:and Tomlin could have played in goal, iam sure :lol:
No, I believe that he had Danny pencilled in for that job! :clap: :clap: :goal: :goal: :lol: :lol: :lol: :scarf: