Torquay United v Southend United - 14/12/13
Posted: 11 Dec 2013, 23:45
Apart from the not bothering to go bit, I agree with brucie.
Bringing TUFC fans together, from Plainmoor to across the globe
https://torquayfans.com/
Sorry old boy; too busy having a life to assist your understanding on this one. Rest assured that we perceptive types can appreciate the difference between a quality pro keeper and a local boy done good.ferrarilover wrote:But can anyone actually point out these goals that we've conceded for having Rice rather than Poke? Dave said they exist, but no one has actually evidenced it yet. I've got all the FLSs on my Sky Plus (it's not deliberate, I'm just enormously forgetful), so pick me a game and a goal and we'll have a look.
Matt.
Reading between the lines in Dave Thomas summing up, as well as our season being defined over the coming five games, Knill's season will also be .........nickbrod wrote: For me I agree with David Thomas, our season will be defined over the coming five games.
tomogull wrote: Reading between the lines in Dave Thomas summing up, as well as our season being defined over the coming five games, Knill's season will also be .........
if that's how you view the difference between Poke and Rice then you are more warped than Knill. There is very little between the two of them and Rice is in possession of the shirt so it's his to keep or lose, he's done absolutely nothing to warrant being dropped.jonnyfive wrote: Sorry old boy; too busy having a life to assist your understanding on this one. Rest assured that we perceptive types can appreciate the difference between a quality pro keeper and a local boy done good.
royalgull wrote: if that's how you view the difference between Poke and Rice then you are more warped than Knill. There is very little between the two of them and Rice is in possession of the shirt so it's his to keep or lose, he's done absolutely nothing to warrant being dropped.
Agree with most of the post, but the highlighted bit is the same message I tried to get across, for me Rice does not deserve to be dropped nor does Tonge. However you're spot on, we do have to try something different, often a freshen up can be the very thing that sparks the team, if we carry rolling on blindly from match to match, we're going down for sure, and there will be no coming back from it a second time, there is nobody to bankroll us back like last time.brucie wrote:Probably our biggest game of the season. I was up for going to this one because it really is a must win game. Lose this one and we will be cut well and truly adrift. However I cannot face the round trip with Knill still in charge.
We shouldn't be quaking in our boots over playing Southend. If you look through our squad we shouldn't be doing as badly as we are with the players that we have got so the blame falls firmly at the feet of the manager.
The debate over Poke or Rice goes on but really Knill has to try something different because what he has been trying isn't working - we are leaking goals like they are going out of fashion.
Knill should bring back Pearce at centre half and Poke in goal - tough on Rice but Poke is a better keeper.
O'Connor apparently isn't a full back but played 50 games there for Burton and plays in that position for the Irish team. He is twice as quick as Tonge and needs to be given a go there. Pearce is too good a player to be left out as is Poke and O'Connor is better than Tonge, simple as that.
Yep you're right Nick. As said I've been lucky enough to see a heck of lot of professional goalkeeper coaching, one thing you hear constantly drummed into younger keepers is, it's not about the glory saves for a keeper, it's about not having the shot to save in the first place.nickfrench82 wrote:Playing devils advocate for a minute, I can see both sides to the keeper debate.
Rice is in the side, he's performed admirably, and has done absolutely nothing to warrant being dropped.
Poke is probably the better keeper, and bringing him into the side, COULD, help our defence, who may collectively not have as much confidence with Rice behind them.
I'm not saying which option is right, but we're in a difficult position, and we're all pushing for changes around the pitch. If Poke plays, doesn't have a save to make, but we win, isn't that what we're after?
Spot on. This is it now The board have entrusted Alan to get us out of this whether by choice or not but we're stuck with him now and these next 5 or 6 games IMO will determine whether we go down or not and whether or not the decision to keep Knill was the correct one. If it all goes wrong over Christmas then there is really no point in sacking him in the New Year because we'll already be well cut adrift. The time to do it was these last 2 weeks but it wasn't done. Now we just have to wait and see if Knill can turn our form around in 6 games. If he can't, and there is no basis to think that he can, then we need a major miracle in the New Year and have to suddenly go on a run of title winning form.Without wanting to take this down the 'should Knill be sacked' route, if our season is defined negatively over the next 5 games, and then Knill gets the chop, then the latter will have come FAR too late.