RED CARD? 1 Match or 3

Discuss everything TUFC with fans across the globe.
Post Reply
y_e_l_l_o_w
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 15
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 08:58
Favourite player: Downes

RED CARD? 1 Match or 3

Post by y_e_l_l_o_w »

Hi All,

I wanted to ask all you football guru's out there if you can explain the rule behind suspensions from a straight red card as received by Downes last weekend.

Twice in the same article on the Torquay website

http://www.torquayunited.com/news/artic ... 37509.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The suspension has been referred to as one match however I was always under the impression that a straight red was a 3 match suspension.

If this is not the case then how can an accumalation of 5 Yellows, or 2 Yellows in a game constitute the same ban as a straight red card (1 match as suggested by this article)

Would be good to hear your responses.

YELLOW.
supergulls
Skipper
Skipper
Posts: 736
Joined: 17 Jun 2012, 09:14
Favourite player: Aaron Downes

Post by supergulls »

A professional foul such as preventing a goal scoring opportunity is a straight red but you only receive a one match ban where as a red card for violent conduct or serious foul play is a 3 game ban.
y_e_l_l_o_w
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 15
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 08:58
Favourite player: Downes

Post by y_e_l_l_o_w »

Thank you, appreciate your reply.
supergulls
Skipper
Skipper
Posts: 736
Joined: 17 Jun 2012, 09:14
Favourite player: Aaron Downes

Post by supergulls »

I think the difference is where you clearly meant to cause injury. Also in the case of using foul and abusive language is also a 3 game ban I hope this clears things up.
User avatar
Scott Brehaut
TorquayFans Admin
TorquayFans Admin
Posts: 4556
Joined: 05 Sep 2010, 16:04
Favourite player: Lee Mansell
Location: Guernsey

Post by Scott Brehaut »

Somewhere (I think on the match day thread, however I am on my phone so not going to look for it) I copied out the FA rules detailing what was needed for a one, two or three match ban. It was clear from this that Downes is suspended for one game only. EDIT: HERE http://www.torquayfans.com/viewtopic.ph ... 470#p81470" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

If you look on the FA website tomorrow (they don't update their site on bank holidays) you will find an area marked "suspensions" - click in there and then "league 2" (this is all from memory so forgive me if not totally correct) and you will find how many matches Dowes (and any other player that takes your fancy) is suspended for. EDIT: http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/~/link.aspx? ... 9199B&_z=z" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image

STIP
Friend of torquayfans.com
ferrarilover
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7759
Joined: 02 May 2018, 19:20
Favourite player: You'll find out ;-)

Post by ferrarilover »

Jesus, how far behind are the FA? LRT suspended for three Torquay United first team matches for a sending off in February (or words to that effect). So far behind, I'm not sure where to begin.

As to the OP, Scotty B's excellent research is absolutely accurate. It's a common misconception that a red card is three matches. In fact, surprisingly few are. If I had my way, I would invoke a ruling based upon the nature of the offence and the time it was committed. Let's say player commits a 'professional foul', (let's use Downer's as an example). Not dangerous in any way, not the type of offence for which any real punishment would be deserved, but a sending off needs to be awarded to prevent that type of offence too common. If the offence is committed in the first minute of a match, then the player is effectively banned for two matches (the one in which he commits the offence plus his one match ban). Equally, the team is forced to play the whole match with 10 men, which is unfair and unbalanced upon the league table and consequently unfair on all the other teams in that division. The players who play in that match are likely to have to work much harder and me more knackered. The list of things which are affected goes on and on.
If a guy commits the same offence in the 95th minute, none of these things are a factor and the ban is effectively half as long for the sake of committing an identical offence. One could argue that committing the offence in the final minute is more serious than committing the offence in the first minute, precisely because the "benefiting" team have the man advantage for less time.

Perhaps if the player was dismissed before the 61st minute, then no ban could be applied? It's not a perfect system, but it might be somewhat more fair than what we have now. That or a sin bin, whereby the referee is permitted to dismiss a player for anything from 15 minutes to the remainder of the match, then allow the FA to make the decision on further punishment on a case by case basis.
It's quite labour intensive, but then, given the time the FA spend on enforcing and creating pointless rules (did anyone else see the "if you have blue socks, you must have blue sock tape" farce in the Man City v Southampton game?), I don't think they'll have trouble finding manpower to redirect.

Sorry, was that a bit much?

Matt.
J5 said, "ferrarilover is 100% correct"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests